haha, nice. I know the guy who runs internet today, he’ll be pleased it’s spreading :3
yeah im stoked its spreading, but fix that “via” link good sir!!
lmfao Ricky, your picture XDD
and at least your watermark didn’t get cropped like on failblog.
ricky,
I credit the source where I found the item. Just because someone put a watermark on a picture doesn’t mean that’s the original source, so you can’t always go by that. Besides, your site is on the picture.
Take the heat off the discussion, and concentrate in the poor girl whose skin has been so ‘regettably’ marked for life.
🙂
It was on the “What’s Hot” page. I don’t normally go into the sub pages, nor do I usually look at the usernames. If I find something I like I post it and link where I got it from. That seems like a reasonable thing to do. I don’t delete the watermark (your link). If someone wants to know bad enough where it came from then I’ve given them a clue as to where I found it. Then they can do all the research they want to hunt down the original source.
i’m with patoloco… how do you even fix that thing?!
Dear people without tattoos (patoloco and Bambi),
The spelling is intentional, quite a few people have these.
If I wasn’t such a stickler for original tattoos I’d get one myself.
-Loki
Well that makes perfet sens.
Well.. intentional misspelling a tattoo will surely make a original piece of art. Never thought that way. However, I still think she got messed up.
PS: I have 3 tattoos 😀
Damn, and I thought I was being all smart on teh interwebs!
The person I know who has this tattoo loves it, definitely a no regets kinda guy.
Well why would you get it if everyone would go “hey, shouldn’t it be ‘regrets’?” all the time? i’d get ticked off after a while with that…
haha, nice. I know the guy who runs internet today, he’ll be pleased it’s spreading :3
yeah im stoked its spreading, but fix that “via” link good sir!!
lmfao Ricky, your picture XDD
and at least your watermark didn’t get cropped like on failblog.
ricky,
I credit the source where I found the item. Just because someone put a watermark on a picture doesn’t mean that’s the original source, so you can’t always go by that. Besides, your site is on the picture.
would it happen to have been this reddit submission: http://www.reddit.com/r/pics/comments/bldwz/ironic_tattoo_failure/ the one with my username that links to my site?
im not sayin, im just sayin
Take the heat off the discussion, and concentrate in the poor girl whose skin has been so ‘regettably’ marked for life.
🙂
It was on the “What’s Hot” page. I don’t normally go into the sub pages, nor do I usually look at the usernames. If I find something I like I post it and link where I got it from. That seems like a reasonable thing to do. I don’t delete the watermark (your link). If someone wants to know bad enough where it came from then I’ve given them a clue as to where I found it. Then they can do all the research they want to hunt down the original source.
i’m with patoloco… how do you even fix that thing?!
Dear people without tattoos (patoloco and Bambi),
The spelling is intentional, quite a few people have these.
If I wasn’t such a stickler for original tattoos I’d get one myself.
-Loki
Well that makes perfet sens.
Well.. intentional misspelling a tattoo will surely make a original piece of art. Never thought that way. However, I still think she got messed up.
PS: I have 3 tattoos 😀
Damn, and I thought I was being all smart on teh interwebs!
The person I know who has this tattoo loves it, definitely a no regets kinda guy.
Well why would you get it if everyone would go “hey, shouldn’t it be ‘regrets’?” all the time? i’d get ticked off after a while with that…