Purchasing vs. Leasing Explained

Purchasing
Heather
  The  math on the Paul McCartney-Heather Mills divorce is as follows: After 5 years of marriage, he paid her $49  million.
 Assuming he had sex every night during their 5 year relationship it ended up costing him $26,849 per time. 
                                      This is  Heather.  —>
 
  
 
Kristen Leasing
 
 On  the other hand, New York Governor Elliot Spitzer’s hooker,  Kristen, an absolute stunner charges $4,000 per night.
                                       This  is Kristen.  —>
 
 
 

Had Paul  McCartney “employed” Kristen for 5 years,    he  would have paid $7.3 million in total, for sex every  night  for 5 years: (a  $41.7 million savings).   
Value-added benefits are:
 ?    a  22 year old 
 ?    no  begging
 ?    no  coaxing
 ?    never  a headache
 ?    happily  agrees to all requests
 ?    no complaining
 ?    no  honey-do lists
 Best of all, she leaves and comes back when asked.   
 
 
 All  at 1/7th the cost and no legal fees.  Sometimes leasing just makes more sense.

Thanks Mike (from Spain)

12 thoughts on “Purchasing vs. Leasing Explained”

  1. You’re so right Infi and he wouldn’t have had to wake up to that “purchased” face every morning. *Shiver*

  2. On the other hand, McCartney’s career didn’t crash and burn publicly because of his divorce. Plus, I suspect they did other things besides screw.

  3. Even cheaper yet, he could have just used his hand and a bottle of lotion. A bottle of “Suave-Vitamin E with moisturizer” is $3.50. Assuming one bottle every three months, that’s $70.

    The only point of a spouse is for sex. Thanks for clearing that up.

Leave a Comment