17 thoughts on “Different views on creation”

  1. “Well, Dear, it’s very simple.
    I told you a fairy tale written by people who didn’t know better,
    and your mother told you what educated people think happened based on all the evidence available.”

  2. SOOO serious, Reader. Read Origin of Species, huh?. I disagree. I believe they knew better. To the early Christians eternal credit, tho, they looked around at people, picked all of the best stuff, and bestowed it all upon a nearly perfect candidate, who walked among them on this earth. It’s the bad-stuff guy; red, horns, NO redeeming virtue, inhabits a deep and hot hole, that loses me. How’d they know about her? So that’s probably where I’m bound.

  3. Scott, I hear tell people and their pets start merging their idiosyncracies after a time. Let’s set up shifts to monitor the “co” brothers

  4. Wow, chemistry and biology–the REAL stuff of life. I stand in awe, really. I’d love to talk with you awhile–considering your science as related to your earlier post. I kid, of course, about Darwin. I’m an economist with a background heavy in Evolutionary eco: the theory of constant synthesis thru history between past-binding ceremonial institution and forward-pushing technology–a branch started at the U. of Texas by Clarence Ayers in the 1940’s with heavy influence from Thorstein Veblen

  5. Sure, what would you like to talk about? I don’t know much about evolutionary economics though. The only thing I can consider similar to biological evolution is that only the products that sell well stay on the market and maybe give rise to subproducts. Products which stop selling or do not sell just disappear.

    [email protected] is my email if you want to talk.

Leave a Comment