Wow, it sure was nice of “not right in the head” to downsize another content creator’s time-consuming, original photoshops to the point where the real creator’s watermark is no longer readable, then slap a different watermark for their own site on it that is conveniently totally readable. Then they screwed up the grammar on the one “original” thing they added to it. (It’s “if there were”, not “if there was”). Guess I’ll never be visiting or linking to “not right in the head”, since they’ve made their level of ethics and competence clear.
Wow, it sure was nice of “not right in the head” to downsize another content creator’s time-consuming, original photoshops to the point where the real creator’s watermark is no longer readable, then slap a different watermark for their own site on it that is conveniently totally readable. Then they screwed up the grammar on the one “original” thing they added to it. (It’s “if there were”, not “if there was”). Guess I’ll never be visiting or linking to “not right in the head”, since they’ve made their level of ethics and competence clear.
I corrected the post title so it’s grammatically correct.
Just found the people who actually did all the work: http://www.smosh.com/smosh-pit/photos/20-original-names-famous-snack-foods
Thanks for sharing the link.
geez we are here for humor not grammar 101