Comments on: Do celebrities really die in threes?

By: anonymous

anonymous — Fri, 10 Jul 2009 14:28:22 +0000

More like reporters can only count to three, and have an unhealthy fixation on celebrity.

By: jeff

jeff — Sat, 04 Jul 2009 22:27:45 +0000

add steve mcnair to the list. that makes 3 (6 really) so celebs can relax.

By: Scott

Scott — Wed, 01 Jul 2009 19:56:45 +0000

Karl Malden slipped in ahead of Walter Cronkite.

By: Juana

Juana — Wed, 01 Jul 2009 16:29:10 +0000

Well I’ve been reading up on all of these celebrities die in three articles for the past few days and I really do believe it.
First was David Carradine, then Ed McMahon, then it was Gail Storm, then another cycle started with Farrah Fawecett, Michael Jackson, and then Billy Mays. So this time it was two cycles i’m guessing.?

By: Jonco

Jonco — Mon, 29 Jun 2009 20:35:09 +0000

Rumor has it that Walter Cronkite is on his deathbed too. Looks like we’re shooting for nine.

By: cb

cb — Mon, 29 Jun 2009 16:12:05 +0000

Your sixth celebrity is Gale Storm, who passed over the weekend

By: DJ

DJ — Mon, 29 Jun 2009 01:49:52 +0000

Celebrities weren’t dying this fast when Bush was president.

By: Bill

Bill — Mon, 29 Jun 2009 01:10:09 +0000

good grief, random chance should have produced a bigger list than that

By: revrick315

revrick315 — Mon, 29 Jun 2009 00:46:32 +0000

Recently, I think there is an overall increase in celebrity deaths and we need some type of massive celebrity bailout to protect these national treasures…

By: PaulV

PaulV — Mon, 29 Jun 2009 00:36:45 +0000

Statistically, there were thousands more celebrity deaths that did not occur in threes in the last nine years. In fact, my cursory research revealed that most celebrities died in groups of one!