<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Remotes for Dummies</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bitsandpieces.us/2009/03/02/remotes-for-dummies/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bitsandpieces.us/2009/03/02/remotes-for-dummies/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 01:20:27 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Eric B</title>
		<link>http://bitsandpieces.us/2009/03/02/remotes-for-dummies/comment-page-1/#comment-49516</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 02:42:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bitsandpieces.us/2009/03/02/remotes-for-dummies/#comment-49516</guid>
		<description>So often I&#039;ve thought about a functional yet simple remote for grand/parents (programmable by someone technical for their particular setup) -- biggest problem being setting the correct input for all the g&#039;d set top boxes; even cable now requires them (and its own remote; Comcast recently made their own &quot;digital switch&quot; last month that requires a separate box in their city; no more TV tuner function at all).

I want a remote wherein one can push &quot;Cable TV&quot;, and it turns on the TV (or leaves on), sets Ch.3 or other input, and ensures that Channel/Volume/other buttons now only control the cable box and not the TV (otherwise getting static). Even masking off the remote buttons above, it&#039;s too easy for things to get &quot;out-of-sync&quot;. I haven&#039;t been able to think up a universal remote sequence that ensure all the correct settings, as most TVs just have a &quot;toggle power&quot; / &quot;switch-input-to-the-next-one&quot; instead of separate &quot;power-tv-on&quot; / &quot;switch-to-input-2&quot; / &quot;power-tv-off&quot; commands -- grr...

Every 6mo visit entails illustrative &amp; laminated direction cards and training (which is quickly lost) to navigate cable/satellite, DVD, and VCR functions (all entailing using different remotes or a single remote which must be put into different modes for each step: press TV button, press power, press 3, press enter, press Cable, press power, press channel or volume; press power, press TV, press power --- if you get static, press TV button, press 3, press enter, press Cable, press channel ...)

Why the $#@! is there an &quot;eject&quot; button on the DVD remote ??

-e</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So often I&#8217;ve thought about a functional yet simple remote for grand/parents (programmable by someone technical for their particular setup) &#8212; biggest problem being setting the correct input for all the g&#8217;d set top boxes; even cable now requires them (and its own remote; Comcast recently made their own &#8220;digital switch&#8221; last month that requires a separate box in their city; no more TV tuner function at all).</p>
<p>I want a remote wherein one can push &#8220;Cable TV&#8221;, and it turns on the TV (or leaves on), sets Ch.3 or other input, and ensures that Channel/Volume/other buttons now only control the cable box and not the TV (otherwise getting static). Even masking off the remote buttons above, it&#8217;s too easy for things to get &#8220;out-of-sync&#8221;. I haven&#8217;t been able to think up a universal remote sequence that ensure all the correct settings, as most TVs just have a &#8220;toggle power&#8221; / &#8220;switch-input-to-the-next-one&#8221; instead of separate &#8220;power-tv-on&#8221; / &#8220;switch-to-input-2&#8243; / &#8220;power-tv-off&#8221; commands &#8212; grr&#8230;</p>
<p>Every 6mo visit entails illustrative &amp; laminated direction cards and training (which is quickly lost) to navigate cable/satellite, DVD, and VCR functions (all entailing using different remotes or a single remote which must be put into different modes for each step: press TV button, press power, press 3, press enter, press Cable, press power, press channel or volume; press power, press TV, press power &#8212; if you get static, press TV button, press 3, press enter, press Cable, press channel &#8230;)</p>
<p>Why the $#@! is there an &#8220;eject&#8221; button on the DVD remote ??</p>
<p>-e</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yossef</title>
		<link>http://bitsandpieces.us/2009/03/02/remotes-for-dummies/comment-page-1/#comment-49351</link>
		<dc:creator>Yossef</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 03:13:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bitsandpieces.us/2009/03/02/remotes-for-dummies/#comment-49351</guid>
		<description>Also, I meant the remote on the left, the TV remote. I was so excited about pointing out how to do this better that I temporarily forgot how to tell left from right.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also, I meant the remote on the left, the TV remote. I was so excited about pointing out how to do this better that I temporarily forgot how to tell left from right.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yossef</title>
		<link>http://bitsandpieces.us/2009/03/02/remotes-for-dummies/comment-page-1/#comment-49350</link>
		<dc:creator>Yossef</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 03:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bitsandpieces.us/2009/03/02/remotes-for-dummies/#comment-49350</guid>
		<description>I think I used to have that remote on the right.

If both of these remotes are needed to operate one system (as I assume is the case, since one remote controls the TV and volume and the other controls the channels), this could be taken one step further by getting a universal remote or *something* to control both what gets played and how loud it will be, then applying this same treatment to that one remote.

Seriously, people.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think I used to have that remote on the right.</p>
<p>If both of these remotes are needed to operate one system (as I assume is the case, since one remote controls the TV and volume and the other controls the channels), this could be taken one step further by getting a universal remote or *something* to control both what gets played and how loud it will be, then applying this same treatment to that one remote.</p>
<p>Seriously, people.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: links for 2009-03-04 : Maitri&#8217;s VatulBlog</title>
		<link>http://bitsandpieces.us/2009/03/02/remotes-for-dummies/comment-page-1/#comment-49314</link>
		<dc:creator>links for 2009-03-04 : Maitri&#8217;s VatulBlog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 23:01:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bitsandpieces.us/2009/03/02/remotes-for-dummies/#comment-49314</guid>
		<description>[...] Remotes For Dummies Simple and effective. Forget my parents, I need this done to my Cox cable remote. (tags: tv technology lifehacks funny) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Remotes For Dummies Simple and effective. Forget my parents, I need this done to my Cox cable remote. (tags: tv technology lifehacks funny) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Suzanne Shifflett</title>
		<link>http://bitsandpieces.us/2009/03/02/remotes-for-dummies/comment-page-1/#comment-49269</link>
		<dc:creator>Suzanne Shifflett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 15:39:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bitsandpieces.us/2009/03/02/remotes-for-dummies/#comment-49269</guid>
		<description>It should be more like, Brain off. Mute for commercials. The # of adult channels. A pouch for a condom.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It should be more like, Brain off. Mute for commercials. The # of adult channels. A pouch for a condom.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BobK</title>
		<link>http://bitsandpieces.us/2009/03/02/remotes-for-dummies/comment-page-1/#comment-49238</link>
		<dc:creator>BobK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 10:18:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bitsandpieces.us/2009/03/02/remotes-for-dummies/#comment-49238</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m planning on buying a cheap universal remote for Mom and crazygluing all the dangerous buttons and coloring them black.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m planning on buying a cheap universal remote for Mom and crazygluing all the dangerous buttons and coloring them black.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: isiah</title>
		<link>http://bitsandpieces.us/2009/03/02/remotes-for-dummies/comment-page-1/#comment-49152</link>
		<dc:creator>isiah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 23:47:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bitsandpieces.us/2009/03/02/remotes-for-dummies/#comment-49152</guid>
		<description>utterly brillant!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>utterly brillant!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Damon</title>
		<link>http://bitsandpieces.us/2009/03/02/remotes-for-dummies/comment-page-1/#comment-49141</link>
		<dc:creator>Damon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 23:15:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bitsandpieces.us/2009/03/02/remotes-for-dummies/#comment-49141</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve taken this one to the next level - sort of...  I took the remotes at home, grabbed a sharp exacto blade, and sliced off all the buttons I don&#039;t need or want flush with the surface of the remote.  They are all still there if I want to use them, but it keeps me from hitting them accidentally...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve taken this one to the next level &#8211; sort of&#8230;  I took the remotes at home, grabbed a sharp exacto blade, and sliced off all the buttons I don&#8217;t need or want flush with the surface of the remote.  They are all still there if I want to use them, but it keeps me from hitting them accidentally&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonco</title>
		<link>http://bitsandpieces.us/2009/03/02/remotes-for-dummies/comment-page-1/#comment-49129</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonco</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 22:29:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bitsandpieces.us/2009/03/02/remotes-for-dummies/#comment-49129</guid>
		<description>It really is much more practical that people realize.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It really is much more practical that people realize.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christopher</title>
		<link>http://bitsandpieces.us/2009/03/02/remotes-for-dummies/comment-page-1/#comment-49123</link>
		<dc:creator>Christopher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 20:55:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bitsandpieces.us/2009/03/02/remotes-for-dummies/#comment-49123</guid>
		<description>that one on the right is the same as the original xbox remote, no?
http://www.activewin.com/reviews/xbox/hardware/dvd_remote/dvd.jpg</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>that one on the right is the same as the original xbox remote, no?<br />
<a href="http://www.activewin.com/reviews/xbox/hardware/dvd_remote/dvd.jpg" rel="nofollow" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.activewin.com/reviews/xbox/hardware/dvd_remote/dvd.jpg?referer=');">http://www.activewin.com/reviews/xbox/hardware/dvd_remote/dvd.jpg</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
